Access Menu

Utility Links

Do-it logo

Site Navigation


The Students' Blog e-mail this to a friend

If you think students spend all their spare time avoiding studying, going out with their mates and having a good time then you'd be right. Well our student bloggers do anyway. While they assure us they don't slack on the study, they've got a lot to answer for when it comes to enjoying themselves while volunteering.

All | Emma | Olivia | Fiona | Sammy | Ashley | Rochelle | Tom | TomG | Harry

« Previous month (Jul 2007) | Main | Next month (Sep 2007) »

08212007 Tuesday Aug 21, 2007

Guilt Trip and partnerships

Hello,

Yesterday I accepted a seemingly innocent invitation to go and visit an orphanage in a village outside the town we are staying in.  After a bus journey and lengthy cycle I came to the village with my giude (the head of the orphanage) to find that infact no orphange existed.  Ahhhhh 'but there are plans, mister Tom'  the orphanage head said..'there are plans'. What there was was an open space, with a few bricks strewn about.  'But Mister Tom we cannot make the orphange without money'.  It quickly  became apparent that this was the aim of taking me to see the site of the proposed orphanage.  I lunched with this mans family (all used to white people, as the head of the orphanage said he brings westerners often) and everyone was very polite.  Was this a scam?  Was i right to feel a bit put out?  The head (Charles was his name, well charles to his friends, but insisted on being known as Prince Charles to people who just knew him) was very nice to me, and his company meant I could venture to a village I wouldn't have otherwise.  But the fact is I'm am already here doing charity work and that he knew this made it feel like a bit much.  The trip he took me on was a very slick operation, designed ( i felt) to persuade me into donating money. 

What exactely the money would go on was unclear.  For me, vague notions of an orphanage are not enough.  Much better the sort of planned development, working in partnership with local people that READ international promotes.  Later Charles took us to a secondary school, perhaps thinking that we could donate this school books as this is what our charity does.  However the region the school was in is not one high on the priority list READ works on.  This priority list is given to us by the Tanzanian Ministry of Education and the partnership READ has with them is extremely important to its ethos as a charity.  Without this partnership, our work would not only be much less useful but conform to the old stereotype of western aid swooping in to make everything right again.  The bare fact is that we have no clue what is best for the poeple here, which schools and which districts need books the most.  We can make a judgement but it is based on a very shallow interpretation of what little knowledge we have.

READ recognises this.  As a student charity, it could raise money all year for 'Princes Charles Orphanage'.  Behaps we could drop in a few comments about how aids is robbing tanzanian children of their parents.  Perhaps, just perhaps this would be a more attractive propisition for the people we stop on the street and ask for money than raising money to send textbooks is.  However it would not be right.  With READ'S empathsis on us volunteers working with the local people, and aiding national policy, we can perhaps give a part of a generation of Tanzanian's the skills to help themselves.  Charles wanted me to do everything for him.  He wanted me to give him money, and on hearing I couldnt, he wanted me to apply for him to interanational charities.  By doing this I would not be empowering or developing.  I would be giving money to a man, with a vague plan, and with no guarentee it would be spent on what he said. 

When people give to READ, or support it in any way, they can be sure they are giving to a charity that is not only accountable to the west's vigarous charity laws but also accountable to Tazanians.  We ensure this by working in partnerships, and by going to local people with a plan and seeing how they want to work it.  Empowerment, development, call it what you want.  But to me, asking local people what they want us to do for them is just common sense.

Tom G

 


Posted by Tom G ( 1:19 PM )
Link to this post Comments[0]

08182007 Saturday Aug 18, 2007

From Tanzania - Cruel to be kind?

Hello,

A week ago I left the UK to fly to Dar es Salaam, the capital of Tanzania.  After a weekend on the beach, meeting volunteers from the other READ projects at different universities around the country I have set off on a research trip to three regions in Tanzania which READ hopes to send textbooks to next year.

Each region's REO (regional education officer) will be asked to pick 20 schools from his region out of a possible 60 or 70 to have books donated to them.  At first this selection process seems hard, all the secondary schools are short on books, all want more books and all the children are as worthy as each other to be given the chance to have access to more textbooks.  How do you then make the decision of which 20 schools should recieve the books?

It was only really yesterday, when I looked in at four different schools in the Rukwa region of Tanzania that I realised why it was so important to be selective.  Firstly, by distributing large sets of textbooks to 20 schools, instead of a few to say 50 schools, it is possible perhaps to change what happens here already with textbooks, that one is shared between 10 or more children.  Secondly, by making it clear to the schools that only a few of them will be chosen to recieve textbooks, it may mean that they make an extra effort to fufil our criteria for selection, namely that the school ensures children will have access to books when they want and the school will encourage a culture of reading.  

Yesterday I saw a good example of this.  I visited a private school, funded by a mission, which had lovely buildings and was undeniably the best 'learning environment'  we saw.  However the source of funds for this school, whilst ensuring it looked nice, seemed to draw the line at supplying it adaquetly with resources.  It had less textbooks per child than the government funded schools.  However, the teachers we met were very switched on and alert.  After I had said the READ spiel, they immediately were asking how they could ensure thier school got the books, talked about a library, book loaning system and after school book clubs.  Although this school, and its pupils were undoutably 'better off' than some of the government schools we saw it as clear they would make the most efficient use of the books.  Thus the question that seems to dog so many development decision occurs; do you give donations where it is most needed, or where it will be used to the greatest effect?

Two years ago, I worked in a school in Borneo for three months.  The village was desperately poor, farming enough only to feed themselves and living in pretty poor conditions.  Yet they had a well built school and suprisingly for that area a library that was as well stocked as any English Primary school's might have been.  However the library was not used, the school badly attended and when it was the behaviour of the children terrible.  It was obvious these children had no respect for education, in fact the only education that mattered to them was one of learning how to survive off th land.  The three months that followed were intersting but ultimately a waste of time.  I could not teach these children anything. 

The point I am trying to make is controversial and not as simple as I might make it seem.  However it seems to me that in development and donations we should look far beyond to immediate gratification that a donation might cause.  Books are poccessions and they will cause underpriviledged children to smile and adults to think you are brilliant.  However if they are not used, then all we have done by giving them is make ourselves feel better.  By being harsher and more deliberative perhaps development charities can make more of a difference and a meaningful one.  Perhaps it is wrong to get ahead of ourselves before basic aid is in place.  Perhaps we find these basics boring and do not want to be involved in them.     

Speak soon,

TomG


Posted by Tom G ( 7:21 AM )
Link to this post Comments[0]

08012007 Wednesday Aug 01, 2007

Hello!

Hello,

My name is Tom Gray and I'm a second year student at Warwick University.  I got involved in some conservation work whilst at school, going to Borneo and since then Belize to take part in eco-tourism projects and teaching.  At this point voluntary work and the voluntary sector seemed like an interesting sideline, something to dabble in but then leave behind for seemingly loftier ambitions.

Going to university after a gap year changed this viewpoint.  I began to fancy doing something a bit different with my life.  I got into volunteering not because of high morals and a chance to make a difference, but simply because the type of work you get to do seems interesting.  I might get to travel, I might get to work with local people in cultures I know nothing about, I might get to organise a project from beginning to end and get that sense of satisfaction you get when you know everything has gone well.  Of course I might not get a chance to do any of these things and I might change my mind.  A career in London, with a suit, an office, a comfortable wage, ski-ing holidays, good restaurants and bars and a gym membership has it attractions.  However at the moment I am determined to give something different a go, it would seem silly not to try and who knows what doors may open.

Working for READ international has been one door that has opened since being at university.  The organisation runs projects in several UK universities, collecting textbooks from local schools and sending them to Tanzania, where they are distributed (with advice and guidance) to schools which need them.  These books would have otherwise been thrown away, filling landfills up and down the country.  Instead some (the useful ones which fit the Tanzanian syllabus and come in sets) are recycled and used again.  For me READ seems to optimise the benefits that a well thought out development scheme can bring.  It gives no huge donations, employs minimal paid employees, places responsibility and autonomy in the hands of its volunteers and operates to a successful business model repeated across its projects in universities. 

From volunteering last year, I am going on to become one of three project leaders next year.  This summer I am going to Tanzania with the books and have become involved in the charities fundraising and branding strategy.  The charity will move forward with ambition and professionalism, both qualities which it is increasingly embodying.  It does an awful lot of good for children in Africa but also children here, giving school presentations wherever possible to raise awareness.  It is a low cost, low overhead but high impact charity in its infancy.  I feel lucky to have become a part of it.  I will be in touch again soon.

Tom G    


Posted by Tom G ( 3:29 PM )
Link to this post Comments[2]

print this page

quick search

quick search

Try the advanced search

Links to other do-it blogs

Archive

RSS

Search Blog


 

 

Links

Alert do-it.org.uk

Seen something dodgy on this blog? Contact us